Title: |
Hard work being done to curb Cutthroat decline |
Date: |
March 04, 2004 |
Source: |
Teton Valley News |
Author: |
Cody Clapp |

Driggs, Idaho - (03/04/2004) - A diverse group of nearly 50 people, including sportsmen,
conservationists, farmers and other concerned residents, attended the
Friends of the Teton River meeting Thursday night to consider a
threatened native to the area, the Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout.
The group listened to Idaho Fish and Game Fisheries Biologist Jim
Fredricks and Friends of the Teton River executive director Lyn Benjamin
speak on topics concerning the Teton River and other threatened
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout Fisheries. Immediately afterward, an open
discussion was held for public input to try and ascertain possible
solutions and further encourage an open dialogue on the subject.
Fredricks spoke on the history of the Teton River and the South Fork of
the Snake River. He presented an impressive compilation of data
collected on both rivers through years of studies conducted by the Idaho
Fish and Game. The focus of his talk was the conditions contributing to
the decline in Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout populations in the Teton and
Snake River.
As a fish biologist, Fredricks explained the techniques used to gather
information about fish populations and described the relationship of
river flows, low precipitation, fry survival rate and other factors that
have contributed to the changing river environment and overall decline
of the trout population.
While the overall trout population was discussed, the main point of the
talk was reduced cutthroat populations in the Teton River. Fredricks
addressed a number of possible causes including whirling disease, low
precipitation and water pollution.
Cutthroat mainly utilize tributary streams to spawn whereas rainbow
trout spawn mainly in the main stem of the river. The drought cycle of
recent years has lowered the water table and, in turn, lowered water
flow in the tributary streams of the Teton River, effectively drying up
higher elevation water streams.
These tributary streams in the Teton have been disconnected from their
spring sources for many years due to decades of diversion for
irrigation. This has shortened possible spawning grounds for the
cutthroat by eliminating the middle parts of the tributary streams. An
issue for a number of years, this factor has not been singled out as a
probable cause for the more recent decline in cutthroat population. With
the recent record low water flows, however, the tributaries have
recessed further and suffered even greater loss of proper cutthroat
spawning habitat.
The South Fork has suffered a similar overall decline in trout
population due to the drought, but the tributaries of the South Fork are
still in relatively decent shape compared to the Teton. Fredericks felt
that the South Fork maintains an overall resiliency that the Teton is
lacking.
Fish and Game feels confident that their current strategy of promoting
anglers to harvest rainbows out of the South Fork will enable cutthroat
growth without stifling overall trout populations, but Fredericks was
hesitant to say that this same strategy would work on the Teton River.
The fish biologist believed that a new cutthroat will replace every
rainbow taken out of the South Fork, but on the Teton this might not
work. Fredricks believed, rather, that the Teton would benefit from a
catch and release only policy with regard to cutthroat and that
encouraging any sort of harvest may be detrimental to the overall
population of trout in the river.
"The Teton river has suffered an overall trout density decline, and this
points to a bigger overall problem," Fredericks said.
Another effect of the recent drought years is that fry survival has
become a problem. Fry are infant trout just hatched from their eggs.
They require structure, cover and slow pools to survive to maturity. In
many areas on the Teton, riparian areas have been lost and fry survival
is low. Some areas are still producing high fry numbers, but they
ultimately have a low survival rate. Other areas on the Teton are simply
not producing adequate number of fry.
Fredricks showed a correlation between high and low spring runoff and
cutthroat and rainbow population increase. Simply put, if there is a
normal runoff - a sharp rise early in the spring followed by a quick
decline toward the beginning of summer - then cutthroat populations do
well. If there is a more mild increase in flow followed by a steady
decrease then rainbow populations do well.
The past years have seen weak runoff due to lack of sufficient snow pack
in Teton Valley, propagating more successful rainbow growth. In the
South Fork, where the Palisades Dam controls flows, there has also been
large rainbow production. Fredricks is confident that normal snowfall
and runoff in the Teton Valley will encourage stronger cutthroat
populations. He is also encouraging the Bureau of Reclamation to
control the flows of Palisades Dam to mimic a more natural runoff.
Flows have affected the overall makeup of the trout population in the
two rivers. A decade ago, the rivers were both predominately cutthroat
with a small percentage of brook and rainbow trout. Now, both rivers,
especially the Teton, have a small percentage of cutthroat compared to a
proportionately large population of the non-native rainbow and brook
trout.
In a phone interview with Fredricks, he explained the history of the
non-native species in the rivers. Fish and Game and local anglers
originally introduced these non-native species. Twenty-five years ago,
Fish and Game planted rainbows in the Teton and the South Fork, not
realizing the rainbow could crossbreed and out-compete the native
cutthroat. The brook trout were introduced in the early twentieth
century by anglers. Trains coming through the area would announce that
they had eastern brook trout available, and anyone was welcome to come
get some to stock their favorite fishing hole.
Lyn Benjamin followed Fredricks' presentation to explain the Friends of
the Teton River's role in conservation of the Yellowstone Cutthroat
Trout and the overall goals of the group. FTR is addressing many of the
issues the Fish and Game have discovered on the Teton River with myriad
solutions.
Friends of the Teton River is trying to help recharge the aquifer by
diverting canal water and flood irrigating in select areas. The aquifer
recharge is considered an instrumental component to restoring the health
of Teton Valley's fisheries and wetlands. By diverting water into key
areas, such as the Fox Creek area, the group hopes to raise the
groundwater levels back up to where they were when it was common
practice to flood irrigate in the Valley.
The group is also working with local landowners to rehabilitate
riverbanks and riparian areas. They have already led bank restoration
projects on five sites and now plan to concentrate their efforts on Fox
Creek and Teton Creek. The restoration projects change depending on the
need of the section, but many include planting new vegetation, fencing
select locations and general re-stabilization of the banks.
FTR is funding programs to pinpoint areas on the river where whirling
disease is prevalent and help reduce spread of the disease. By testing
multiple locations on the river for the disease, the group will be able
to determine infected and uninfected areas. This is important because
the disease is transmittable by many different hosts traveling through
the area, such as a fisherman's waders. If the location of the infection
is known, steps can be taken to reduce the spread of the disease, such
as careful washing of exposed equipment before entering uninfected
areas.
FTR is also participating in programs to isolate and reduce pollution
sources in the Teton River. Last summer, E. coli and nitrate levels
shot up to unhealthy levels in certain areas of the Teton River. Many
theories about where the pollution came from were discussed and
analyzed. There are no conclusive findings as yet; however, FTR plans
to invest more monies into the study if the pollution is determined to
be non-source related. One theory is that if the pollution is non-source
related that it might be contaminated run off out of pastures containing
domestic animal feces. A RNA study of the pollution would be able to
determine the source.
At the same time it is juggling all of these projects, FTR is trying to
conserve the remaining Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout by rehabilitating
upper sections of tributary spawning habitat. The group is hoping to
protect the isolated groups of cutthroat in the very upper sections as a
last holdout in case the rehabilitation takes a further downward trend.
|